| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `anmari has been spreading her infectious positivity throughout our community for over 6 years. Throughout this time Ana has been at the core of all things devious, passionately developing an eclectic gallery, helping organise devmeets, participating in chat events and also recently completed dedicating her time as a Community Volunteer. We are absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2013 to `anmari, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
: )
: )
i think ideographic interpretation of some letter is quite intuitive:
P identity
L not P
Q set
NZ relativity
...
(indeed this is valid for basic concepts, but for particular things it is more complex...)
and i don't know the studies of de Saussure...
: )
Unfortunately, probably due to my lack of knowledge of linguistics, this comes across as random. I don't understand it, though I would like to.
Ferdinand de Saussure is known in some circles as the "father of modern linguistics". His "Course in General Linguistics" is the classic textbook of the study of language, and I believe he was the first to codify and categorize a lot of the stuff that we know today as the "science" of linguistics.
L indicating sometingh else..
Q delimitating a "zone"
NZ just the same "thing" but from a different point of view..
...